Thursday, May 27, 2010



RESOURCE: EMK Press Article Collection

In response to the Hansen case, EMK Press and other adoption professionals put together an article collection called Realistic Expectations: The First Year Home that can be freely downloaded at the following link:

http://www.emkpress.com/realisticexpectations.html

PEAR recommends that prospective adoptive parents and adoptive parents help prepare themselves for parenting challenges by reading the 21 articles in the collection that span topics such as attachment, sleep, finding therapists, sensory integration, unexpected special needs, when adoptions fail and more.

Ethics, Transparency, Support
~ What All Adoptions Deserve.
http://www.pear-now.org/

Wednesday, May 26, 2010



UPDATE: DOS Adoption Alert Nepal

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Bureau of Consular Affairs
Office of Children’s Issues




Caution About Pursuing Adoption in Nepal


May 26, 2010


The U.S. Department of State strongly discourages prospective adoptive parents from choosing adoption in Nepal because of grave concerns about the reliability of Nepal’s adoption system and the accuracy of the information in children’s official files. The Department also strongly discourages adoption service providers from accepting new applications for adoption from Nepal until reforms are made, and asks them to be vigilant about possible unethical or illegal activities under the current adoption system.


The Hague Conference on Private International Law recently released a report on its Intercountry Adoption Technical Assistance Program, based on a visit by a delegate from the Hague Conference’s Permanent Bureau to Nepal in November 2009, available at (
http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/nepal_rpt09.pdf). This report is the result of an independent analysis of Nepal’s intercountry adoption system under the new Terms and Conditions put in place in 2008. The report details a number of weaknesses in Nepal’s adoption system, including ongoing concern about the falsification of documents, improper financial gain, and lack of a child protection system.


Although the U.S. Embassy in Nepal has only seen a handful of adoption cases since the new Terms and Conditions went into effect, we share many of the concerns outlined in the Hague report. As a case in point, in one of the first cases processed by the Government of Nepal after the revision of the Terms and Conditions, the U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu found that the adopted child was not a true orphan and that the birth parents were actively searching for the child.


We encourage parents who have filed an application with the Ministry of Women, Children and Social Welfare (MoWCSW) in Nepal, but have not yet been matched with a child or received an Adoption Decree issued by the Government of Nepal, to consider a change of countries. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) allow one change of country to be made in connection with one’s I-600A application without fee. A request to change countries should be made in writing to the USCIS Field Office where the I-600A was originally filed. More information about how to request a change of country can be found on the USCIS website at
www.uscis.gov (Any subsequent request for a change of country would require a fee.).


Hague-accredited U.S. adoption services providers, and adoption service providers that may apply for Hague accreditation in the future are reminded that their actions in facilitating and/or processing adoptions in any country (whether Hague or non-Hague) will be evaluated during the Hague accreditation or accreditation renewal processes in accordance with the accreditation regulations (22 CFR Part 96), including whether, among other things, the provider has established and rigorously followed ethical adoption practices and operates in the best interest of prospective adoptive children.


Consular Officers are required to conduct an I-604 investigation to verify the child’s orphan status prior to immigrant visa processing. We generally rely upon the host government’s diligence to protect the safety and interests of their own children through careful administration of their national adoption process and use the I-604 investigation to confirm that this process has been followed. Because Nepal’s adoption process is questionable, it can be very difficult to satisfy the requirements of the I-604 investigation. Thus, these investigations could take a matter of months. Prospective adoptive parents are advised that they need to have flexible travel plans and be prepared to stay in Nepal while awaiting the results of the I-604 investigation or plan to make two trips (one to finalize the adoption and a second after the I-604 investigation is completed to bring their child home.)


When an I-600 is adjudicated by USCIS in the United States, consular officers must then conduct an I-604 investigation once the approved petition reaches the Embassy in Nepal to verify the child’s orphan status prior to immigrant visa processing. For I-600 applications filed at the U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu, the I-604 investigation is initiated after the prospective adoptive parents have appeared before a consular officer to sign the application.


Both DOS and USCIS recognize that it would be preferable for the I-604 investigations to be completed earlier in the process. However, under current procedures, the U.S. Embassy cannot begin the I-604 investigation until the PAPs have filed their I-600 application and have submitted the necessary documents pertaining to the adoptive child, such as police reports, newspaper announcements and certification of orphan status. The Department of State and USCIS are currently in discussion about possible ways to revise the procedures under U.S. Government control to mitigate this problem.


The U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu continues to meet with officials within the Government of Nepal and with other foreign missions concerning the current status of adoptions in Nepal. The February 25, 2010 joint statement issued by the International Adoption Working Group (an ad hoc group of Embassies in Nepal who have an interest in intercountry adoption issues) may be found at
http://nepal.usembassy.gov/pr-2-24-2010.html.


Adoptive parents may contact the Embassy at
adoptionsnepal@state.gov if they have questions.


Please continue to monitor
http://adoption.state.gov for updated information as it becomes available.


http://adoption.state.gov/news/nepal.html


Ethics, Transparency, Support
~ What All Adoptions Deserve.
http://www.pear-now.org/



UPDATE: DOS Adoption Notice Latvia

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Bureau of Consular Affairs
Office of Children’s Issues



May 25, 2010


Latvia requires periodic post-adoption reporting on the welfare of an adopted orphan in his or her new American family. Latvian law requires that two post-adoption reports be submitted: one after the first year following adoption and one after the second year. The reports should be conducted by the adoptive family’s adoption agency.

The intercountry adoption process requires compliance with the laws of both the United States and the child’s country of origin. While the United States cannot enforce the laws of another country, in order for a strong country-to-country partnership on adoption matters to continue, families and agencies should respect the adoption laws of the child’s country of origin. We strongly encourage agencies to comply with Latvian post-adoption reporting requirements and to submit reports on time. All agencies operating in Latvia have been notified of this requirement. Compliance will help ensure that Latvia’s history of positive experiences with American adoptive families continues.


Ethics, Transparency, Support
~ What All Adoptions Deserve.
http://www.pear-now.org/



LEGISLATIVE ALERT: Haiti/Citzenship

According to a pres release from Senator Landrieu's office, new legislation has been introduced to streamline the pathway to citizenship for children adopted and/or brought home on Humanitatiran Parole from Haiti. http://landrieu.senate.gov/mediacenter/pressreleases/05-26-2010-1.cfm The Bill is not yet published on the Library of COngress website, but PEAR will post links and pertinent text as soon as it is available.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

5/26/10

1,000 Haitian Orphans Stuck in Legal Limbo Senators: We Must Break the Gridlock, Protect Our Children.
WASHINGTON — Approximately 1,000 Haitian orphans who left the earthquake-ravaged country for the United States before their adoptions were finalized are now facing legal limbo and fewer legal protections. U.S. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), and Mary Landrieu (D-LA) proposed legislation to clear the way for these adopted Haitian orphans who were granted humanitarian parole to the U.S. to become citizens.

Senator Gillibrand said, "I am relieved that the Haitian orphans who have been waiting for their adoptive parents are finally safe and sound with their proud mothers and fathers. But the unprecedented devastation has turned the adoption process upside down, where it could take years before these children could have any legal status. In this moment of great uncertainty, we must clear the gridlock and ensure that these children have the legal protections that they deserve."

Senator Inhofe said, "Prior to the devastating earthquake that struck Haiti in January, many Americans sought to open their homes and their lives to the most vulnerable children in Haiti, the orphans. Unfortunately, the earthquake forced these children and their adoptive parents into an abnormal adoption and immigration process. This bill will alleviate the legal burden facing the adoptive parents of this group of orphans, and finally bring needed relief as these adoptive families begin their lives together."

"International adoptions involve a long and complicated process that requires families to complete dozens of steps before a child can become part of a loving family," said Senator Landrieu. "The process is even more difficult for Americans adopting Haitian orphans. Having entered the U.S under the humanitarian parole policy, these children face additional red tape to complete their adoptions and become U.S. citizens. This bill will simplify that process, providing families some piece of mind and safeguards against the expiration of the temporary status."

After the earthquake halted the adoption process and forced 1,000 adopted Haitian orphans to evacuate through humanitarian parole visas with the permission of the Haitian government, thousands of U.S. parents are now confronted with hurdles in their efforts to provide their children legal status in the U.S. Many Haitian children, although deemed orphans by Haitian authorities, did not have all of the final paperwork required for adoption before they left Haiti.

Under the normal international adoption process, an adoptive child becomes a U.S. citizen upon entering this country.; Without their adoptions being finalized in Haiti, the children who entered as humanitarian parolees face a technicality that would result in parents and children waiting years before prospective legal immigration status is granted.

There is no safety net to assure that these children would become citizens, as they would have otherwise been under conventional channels. So long as their status is in limbo, these children are left with fewer legal protections, may not be eligible for critical resources and risk being forced to return to the ravaged country if something were to happen to their adoptive families.

The Gillibrand-Inhofe-Landrieu legislation addresses these concerns by recognizing the extenuating circumstances following the earthquake facing these Haitian orphans by cutting through the legal limbo and clearing the way for Haitian orphans who were granted humanitarian parole to join their adoptive families in the U.S. to become citizens. These orphans have been vetted by Haitian and U.S. authorities for inter-country adoption to the United States. Under the Help HAITI Act of 2010, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would allow families, who are U.S. citizens, to apply immediately on their adopted children's behalf to become legal permanent residents and eventually qualify for citizenship.


Ethics, Transparency, Support
~ What All Adoptions Deserve.
http://www.pear-now.org/



UPDATE: Hague - Special Commission Convening in June 2010

The Special Commission on the practical operation of the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption will convene June 17 - 25 at The Academy Building of the Peace Palace, Carnegieplein, The Hague.

From the Draft Agenda:

The objective of the Special Commission is to review the practical operation of the 1993 Convention and to achieve consensus on the main elements of a Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation and Adoption Accredited Bodies. The one day discussion on the abduction, sale and traffic in children in the context of intercountry adoption on the first day, 17 June 2010, does not, however, follow the usual format of a Special Commission review, as some independent experts have been invited to speak on this subject. There will be a period of discussion after each presentation, one aim being to find common ground in responding to such cases.

In relation to the draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation and Adoption Accredited Bodies, the discussion will take place on Friday and Saturday morning, 18-19 June. It is not intended that the Special Commission should engage in detailed drafting for the Guide but rather consider its contents from the point of view of Convention obligations, general principles and possible good practices.

This agenda is a provisional draft agenda. It is being sent to participants so they may see the proposed outline for the meeting. The draft agenda could be considered as a work in progress and it may be modified before the meeting to adjust the time of some sessions and to add some discussion points. The draft agenda will be treated with some flexibility and may need to be modified in the light of continuing discussions in the Special Commission.

The Draft Agenda lists the following presentations and discussions pertinent to ethical adoption practices:

Thursday 17 June 2010 Abduction, sale and traffic in children in the context of intercountry adoption
  • Presentation by the Permanent Bureau: a brief analysis of Questionnaire responses on abduction, sale and trafficking
  • Presentation: A Global perspective on trafficking: Professor David Smolin, USA
  • Presentation: An African perspective on trafficking: Dr Benyam Mezmur, Ethiopia
  • Plenary discussion
  • Documentary film: Paper orphans Introduction by Mr Joseph Aguettant, Terre des Hommes Foundation in Nepal
  • Investigating the grey zones of intercountry adoption: Hervé Boechat, ISS
  • Plenary discussion and discussion of possible conclusions for this day

Friday 18 June 2010 Draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation
  • Chapter by chapter review of draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation

Saturday 19 June 2010 Draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation
  • Chapter by chapter review of draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation (cont.)

Monday 21 June 2010 Applying the safeguards of the Convention
  • Opening statements by experts on developments of particular interest in their States Setting the scene - trends and statistics: presentation by Professor Peter Selman
  • Applying the safeguards of the Convention
  • Subsidiarity
  • Establishing whether a child is adoptable
  • Consents to the adoption
  • Counselling and preparation of the prospective adoptive parents
  • Agreements given under Article 17 c)
  • Financial aspects of intercountry adoption: issues not covered in discussion of draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation (days 2 and 3)

Tuesday 22 June 2010 Co-operation issues
  • Co-operation, communication and networking between Central Authorities
  • Sharing of responsibility between receiving States and States of origin
  • Intercountry adoption in the context of globalisation and international mobility
  • Co-operation (development aid) projects: setting the limits of ethical activity (issues not covered in discussion of draft Guide to Good Practice on Accreditation (days 2 and 3))

Wednesday 23 June 2010 Issues concerning Convention procedures
  • Certificate of conformity under Article 23
  • Recognition and effects of adoption
  • Private and independent adoptions
  • Surrogacy and intercountry adoption: connection and concerns
  • Use of Recommended Forms

Thursday 24 June 2010 Learning from experience
  • Monitoring of the Convention Post-adoption issues
  • Statistics: the role of the Permanent Bureau in their collection
  • Non-Convention countries: a co-ordinated approach and the role of bilateral agreements Technical assistance programme and other training programmes
  • Response to disaster situations: a common approach

Friday 25 June 2010 Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Conclusions and Recommendations of the Special Commission: discussion and agreement

The full Draft Agenda can be downloaded at:
http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/adop2010agenda_e.pdf

Ethics, Transparency, Support
~ What All Adoptions Deserve.
http://www.pear-now.org/